• Welcome to BookAndReader!

    We LOVE books and hope you'll join us in sharing your favorites and experiences along with your love of reading with our community. Registering for our site is free and easy, just CLICK HERE!

    Already a member and forgot your password? Click here.

Readers vs Writers

The Backward OX

New Member
Readers vs Writers

Some five years ago, retired and looking for something to do, the idea of writing fiction developed slowly in me.

Part of this slow development was the joining of a writers’ forum. I thought I might learn a thing or two.

One of the things I learnt was that the writers – and I use that word advisedly – infesting that site all had a particular bee in their bonnets about something that fiction writing must contain.

It was “conflict”.

I was told, over and over, and in no uncertain terms, that any story lacking conflict was doomed to failure, that agents/publishers/readers would condemn all such writing.

I sought to verify this with one of my favourite readers. I’ve known her well for 20 years. She is an inexhaustible reader. She reads stories that contain conflict. She ALSO reads stories that, to use her own words, are a nice, easy, pleasant, relaxing read, that by definition DO NOT contain conflict.

The reason I’m making this observation is that my natural style of writing does not lend itself to conflict. I like to write stuff that is nice, easy, pleasant and relaxing to read.

So what do you think? Has my reader got it wrong? Is she in fact reading conflict while being unaware this is so, or is there a market amongst readers for conflict-free stories?

Go ahead, make my day.
 
I do think it is safe to say that the vast majority of fiction has conflict. I am also a prolific reader and I can't remember off the top of my head reading something that didn't have conflict. Of course conflict doesn't have to be between two opposing people. The conflict can be with oneself and take place solely within the mind of the character. Nor does the conflict have to be life threatening.

I'm not saying it can't be done. It might be easier to do in a genre like comedy. I just can't think of any examples.
 
I have also seen that advice, that the vast majority of stories you see, in books, movies or TV, follow the same formula: a hero and a problem and the story of how he/she confronts the problem and succeeds (or not).

A somewhat less nuts-and-bolts description of fiction that I have come across asserts that there is only one story of interesst, written over and over again through all time --a story of the human condition and how a person deals with its complexities. That seems broad enought to span from blood-and-guts to calm inspirational.

What kind did you have in mind that mght be an exception?

(I myself use quasi-hypnotic sleep-inducing images of serene tropical beaches to fall asleep at night but they are clearly not stories, even though some stories also have the same effect. )

:)

Your candidates?
 
I just had a quick look through my bookshelf, and as far as I can tell, every single book, from Stephen King to AA Milne, up to and including the dictionary (both literally and figuratively) has some sort of conflict in it. It'd make for pretty boring stories otherwise.

"It was a pretty nice day. Everyone was content. The end."
 
Readers vs Writers

I was told, over and over, and in no uncertain terms, that any story lacking conflict was doomed to failure, that agents/publishers/readers would condemn all such writing.

Bad news sells. How rare is it to read any "good news" stories in the newspaper, or hear on news broadcasts? Maybe people simply want to know/think that others are worse off than they are.
 
Back
Top