Search results

I think he was trying to say how the "experts" find it to be the best account for what had happened. I am inclined to agree with him however, some parts do seemed contrived, but not enough to really harm the integrity of the book.

while some parts of the book do seem to be rather speculative, I think that in all it is a fair representation. As far as a Columbine expert, Cullen is probably as close to being a Columbine expert as possible( He studied the incident for over ten years). It is difficult to believe some things...

I do think that gun control laws did play a role in this. If there wasnt a ban on federal assault weapons from 1994 till 2004, what types of weapons would they have been using. With acces to a different assortment of weapons and would think that the outcome would no doubt be different. In this...

Finished reading this book and thought that it was very good. I was wondering if I can get any thoughts on the book. What part of Cullen's writing do you think was strong or weak and what kind of overall impression did this book give you. Personally I thought while it wasn't the best written...