M
member 737
Guest
My question is: what do you think about descriptions of nature in books? Many readers regard them as always boring and unnecessary (as they apparently don't add anything to the action) and try to avoid them, which can be troublesome, especially when the picturesque woods and meadows are presented quite often.
On the other hand, the nature can play a significant part in the book, for instance if the author's aim is to familiarise the readers with the place where the action takes place.
To conclude: do you regard numerous descriptions of landscapes as an advantage, or a nuisance?
On the other hand, the nature can play a significant part in the book, for instance if the author's aim is to familiarise the readers with the place where the action takes place.
To conclude: do you regard numerous descriptions of landscapes as an advantage, or a nuisance?